The Guido Fawkes Show is back in the Westminster conversation with its 04.11 episode, which features former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt and guest Ameer Kotecha. The programme airs live every Wednesday at 5pm on X and YouTube. It sits in the busy space between traditional broadcast interviews and the unfiltered world of online political commentary. The announcement itself is short and does not list topics. What it does show is how political conversation now moves: live, free to watch, and aimed squarely at people who follow British politics closely. This article sets out what the show is, where it comes from, why a guest like Hunt carries weight, and how to get the most from watching.
What Is The Guido Fawkes Show?
The Guido Fawkes Show is a weekly video programme produced under the banner of the political website Guido Fawkes, also known as Order-Order. According to the announcement, it streams live on X and YouTube each Wednesday at 5pm UK time. Viewers are invited to subscribe to the YouTube channel so they do not miss an episode. The full episode is then published for anyone who missed the live broadcast.
That format has practical consequences. A live stream gives viewers a sense of immediacy that a recorded and edited package cannot. A permanent video on demand means the conversation can be revisited, clipped and quoted. Together they make the programme a hybrid of live streaming and archive, which is how much modern political media is built.
The Roots of the Brand: Guido Fawkes and Paul Staines
To understand the show, you need to understand the brand behind it. The Guido Fawkes website was founded by Paul Staines in 2004 as a political blog. Its name nods to Guy Fawkes, the conspirator of 1605, and signals an irreverent, anti-establishment stance. Over the years it built a reputation for Westminster gossip, leaked documents and a sharp, often mischievous tone.
That tone matters when you watch the programme. It is not a formal studio interview in the manner of a public service broadcaster. It belongs to a tradition of political commentary that treats politicians as figures to be probed, teased and sometimes challenged, and it assumes an audience that already knows the cast of characters. Readers who want the site’s own output can find it at order-order.com.
Why Jeremy Hunt Is a Significant Guest
Few modern Conservative figures bring as broad a record to a conversation as Jeremy Hunt. He has held three of the major offices of state, and each gives him a different lens on British politics.
Chancellor of the Exchequer
Hunt served as Chancellor of the Exchequer from October 2022 until the change of government in July 2024. He took over in the aftermath of the 2022 mini-budget under Liz Truss, a period of severe market turbulence. Anyone who held that job in that period has a distinctive view on fiscal credibility, public borrowing and the limits of political promises.
Health Secretary
Before that, Hunt was Health Secretary from 2012 to 2018, a long tenure that tied him closely to the National Health Service and its funding pressures. He later chaired a parliamentary select committee on health and social care. This gives him standing in debates about NHS performance, workforce and reform.
Foreign Secretary and leadership contender
Hunt also served as Foreign Secretary and was the runner-up in the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election. Few guests can speak with first-hand authority across the economy, health policy, foreign affairs and internal party contests.
The Guest Pairing and What It Suggests
The announcement names Ameer Kotecha alongside Hunt but gives no detail on what the two discussed, so any claim about the episode’s content would be guesswork. What can be said is that the pairing of a senior former minister with a second guest is typical of the format. It offers the chance for a veteran insider’s perspective to meet a different voice. That can produce sharper exchanges than a lone interview, because guests react to each other as well as to the host.
The honest advice for readers is simple: watch the episode itself. A written preview, including this one, cannot replace the actual conversation. The value of a programme like this lies in tone, hesitation, disagreement and what is left unsaid, none of which survives in a summary.
How to Watch The Guido Fawkes Show Live
The practical details are straightforward, and they are worth setting out clearly for new viewers.
- Time: every Wednesday at 5pm, as stated in the announcement.
- Platforms: live on X and YouTube.
- Catch-up: the full episode is posted for viewing afterwards, so a missed live slot is not a missed episode.
- Subscribing: subscribing to the YouTube channel is the simplest way to be notified when new episodes go up.
Watching on YouTube generally gives a cleaner viewing experience and easier access to the archive. Watching on X puts the programme alongside the live reaction of other users, which suits people who enjoy following a debate as it unfolds.
Why Live Political Video Has Become So Influential
The rise of programmes like this reflects a broader shift. Political audiences increasingly want long-form, direct conversations rather than short broadcast clips. A podcast-style discussion, streamed live, lets a guest develop an argument at length. It also lets viewers judge the person rather than only the sound bite.
There are real advantages. Politicians can speak more candidly, audiences can hear reasoning in full, and independent outlets can compete with established broadcasters. There are also genuine risks. Online formats can reward provocation over precision, and a relaxed setting can blur the line between analysis and entertainment. The sensible approach is to treat such a programme as one input among several, not as a complete account of events.
How to Watch Critically: A Practical Checklist
Whether the guest is a former Chancellor or a commentator, a few habits make viewing more rewarding.
- Separate claims from opinion. Note when a guest cites a figure or a fact, and check it against an official source such as the Office for National Statistics, the Treasury or Parliament’s own records.
- Notice the questions that are not asked. Absent topics can be as revealing as the ones covered.
- Consider the guest’s position. A former minister defending a record is not a neutral witness, however informed.
- Look for disagreement. Where two guests differ, the reason for the difference often teaches more than the points of agreement.
- Compare with other coverage. Read a news report or transcript of the same subject to test your impressions.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does The Guido Fawkes Show air?
According to the announcement, it airs live every Wednesday at 5pm.
Where can I watch The Guido Fawkes Show?
It streams live on X and YouTube, and the full episode is available to watch afterwards on the YouTube channel.
Who appeared on the 04.11 episode?
The guests were Jeremy Hunt and Ameer Kotecha. The announcement does not specify the topics discussed, so viewers should watch the episode for the details.
Who runs the Guido Fawkes website?
The site was founded by Paul Staines in 2004 and operates as a political news and commentary outlet, often referred to as Order-Order.
Is The Guido Fawkes Show free to watch?
The announcement presents the show as streaming on X and YouTube and invites viewers to subscribe to the YouTube channel. It does not mention any charge.
The Bigger Question Behind the Livestream
The most important insight is not about a single episode but about a pattern. Political influence is moving towards formats where a guest can talk for half an hour without an edit, and where an independent brand with a loyal audience can attract serious, senior figures. A former Chancellor appearing on a Westminster-gossip-turned-video-show would have been unusual not long ago. It now looks routine, and that tells us where attention in British politics is heading.
What should readers watch next? First, whether weekly shows like this one keep securing high-profile guests as the political cycle intensifies. Second, whether the platforms themselves, X and YouTube, change their rules on political content, reach or monetisation in ways that reshape who gets heard. Third, whether audiences keep rewarding long, unscripted conversation or drift back towards shorter, faster clips.
A reasonable prediction, and it is only a prediction, is that the line between a political commentary programme and a traditional political interview will keep blurring. The unanswered question is whether that serves voters well. If the programmes bring candour, accountability and genuine disagreement to the surface, they could improve public understanding. If they reward only spectacle, they may deepen the Westminster echo chamber they claim to puncture. The answer will depend less on the hosts or the guests than on the audience, and on whether viewers keep asking not just what was said, but whether it was true.